Nathan Hates Fags

You gotta love the internet. I mean, any two-bit, know-nothing, ignorant, bigoted asshole with a wart on his or her big hairy fanny about some topic du jour which they clearly haven't got the slightest clue about can get online and wax on it as if they were some kind of government-appointed expert and as if there was any good reason that any other sad sack of crap should give a thimbleful of monkey-jizz for what they say anyway.

But enough about me.

I want to talk about Nathan Tabor, the USican equivalent of a young Tory, founder and editor of "The Conservative Voice", and failed congressional wannabe.

This fine upstanding member of the community's latest column is called "Charles Darwin disagrees with homosexuality". A boy, is it a doozy. I'm not sure how Nathan can know what Charles Darwin agrees and disagrees with, Charles having been dead for about a hundred years and all. Maybe Nathan used some sort of Ouija board. I mean, Nathan is a fine upstanding born-again Christian. (Erm, I think he is. I didn't look that up. Didn't need to. But maybe that explains it, because Xtians in the USA are more likely to believe in all that paranormal crap than non-born againers... But I digress.)

No, well, anyway, whatever Charles might have thought if he'd been around to ask, we can be damn sure about one thing. Nathan doesn't like homosexuals. Oh no sir.

And no wonder. As Nathan says:

As I write this column on the afternoon of Labor Day 2005, a handful of homosexuals in the French Quarter are holding a scaled-down "Decadence Parade,"... With dead bodies and human excrement floating in flooded streets throughout the devastated city, these hardy partiers refuse to be deterred.

The bastards. But Nathan gives more reasons why he, er... Charles, er... God, er... he hates fags homosexualists:

Homosexual males live, on average, to the ripe old age of 42...

Not only are homosexuals seemingly blind to their moral conflict with Christianity, they are also blind to their natural conflict with our modern secular god, Science...

Most homosexuals reject God so they can't claim they were "created" the way they are...

From this we can conclude that most agree with the tenets of Darwin's evolutionary theory...

If evolutionists accept homosexuals, the whole Darwinian argument falls apart.

And there we have it... With one fell stroke, Nathan - who previously has given the world no reason to believe that he knows the slightest thing about biology or evolution, brings the whole edifice crashing down about our ears. Yup, all those thousands of University Professors, researchers and students doing biology based on evolutionary theory can go home, 'cause the existence of poofs disproves evolution entirely. Apparently.

But wait... I mean Nathan is a Christian and all, and a journalist (supposedly), so you'd think he might let these biologists and evolutionists (and perhaps the odd gayer) speak for themselves...

Naaaaah, of course he doesn't And why should he worry? He's got a hot wife (no wonder his member is so upstanding!), jesus in his heart, and a target audience that couldn't give a toss about Nathan not knowing his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to biology or evolution.

They don't care that Nathan's figure for the average age of deaths of homosexuals is a piece of hate-mongering crap. They positively do not want to know that evolutionary theory has no problem whatsoever explaining the existence of homosexuality. (Picking curtains? Modelling tank tops? Writing drama? Helloooooooo... Talk about Utility Functions).

What I want to know is... If Nathan lies about what evolutionary theory says and what scientists believe, then how can God love Nathan?